image slide show of all projects

Here is the image slide show of all ARCH 794 projects in Summer quarter 2011.

Traditional Craft / Digital Craft: Some Thoughts on Form, Material, and Assembly

“…a saw cannot be generated from wood, nor does this lie in the power of the [art], for it cannot make a saw of wool or wood. If then it is possible to make the same thing from different matter, clearly the art, ie. the moving principle is the same”  Aristotle, Metaphysics 1044a28   

According to Aristotle, a given form can only be created from certain materials if it is to fulfill all of its definitive functions—as seems obvious, a saw made from wool fails to cut even the softest material. On the other hand, he argues, the same art or “form giver” can produce the same effects in different materials. A “saw” can be made from metal or stone, or today, even a laser. As I was thinking about the ways that form suggests a corresponding material and fabrication process manually, I began to wonder what this might entail for the functional and aesthetic qualities of the finished product, that was both digitally designed and fabricated. During my initial survey of types of designed fabrications for Project1, I began to notice that while the possibilities for three dimensional form creation were seemingly unlimited, the available technology for fabrication seemed to dictate a specific set of strategies for their production governed by questions of material, scale, time, mass, and sometimes cost. Lisa Iwamoto’s Digital Fabrications: Materials and Techniques helped to clarify the connection between the machines used in fabrication and the final assembled product. I became interested in the laser cutter as a particularly versatile machine capable of cutting materials of various scales and sizes into pieces that could be folded, interlocked, or stacked to create three dimensional irregular forms, all for relatively little cost. Using the laser cutter to produce a layered pattern in project 2 encouraged me to consider as well the potential for ornament that the laser cutter makes possible, which due to its complexity or size would be difficult if not impossible to produce by hand. I wondered if this unique capacity of the laser cutter to develop ornament could be put to use in conjunction with the functional elements of a form. For the final project, I began looking for a form determined by simple functional requirements so that I could understand the relationships and re-define them using the parameters of the digital tools I was learning. The discovery of skin on frame boats seemed to present the perfect challenge, not only because of its formal and functional simplicity, but also because it fits into a long tradition of hand-crafted construction techniques that confers aesthetic value as well. My original concept then for the project was to utilize Grasshopper and Rhino to create the boat’s form, but then to consider how the laser cutter could be used to construct it faster, out of more economical material, with a structure that exhibited a new capacity for expressive ornamentation.

Traditional Craft                                                                                                                             To create skin on frame boat the traditional craftsman will begin with a process called “lofting” to determine the boats’ geometry. This process breaks a boat down into three types of views, called the profile (elevation), half breadth (half of a plan view), and stations (cross-sections perpendicular to the profile and related to a center line). Each view is defined by a series of points that are drawn at full scale on the floor. Thin wood pieces called “battens” are tacked from point to point to generate the necessary curves.  

Lofting Diagram from The Boatbuilder’s Apprentice by Greg Rossel.

The craft-person then uses these outlines to construct the necessary formwork on which steam-bent pieces of green wood can be shaped. Steam bending allows the builder to take advantage of wood’s superior strength in the direction of its grain for the entire surface of the boat. The first pieces will correspond to the stations (cross-sections) which will then be connected steam-bent ribs running along the length of the boat. Finally, the boat is wrapped in Dacron Polyester fabric, which shrinks when heat is applied. The Dacron provides a translucent absorptive network on which the epoxy coating creates a durable and waterproof finish. While this creates a light durable and beautiful boat, there are significant disadvantages for many people due to the level of skill required to build it, and the difficulty and cost involved in sourcing high quality green wood for the ribs. Even for the talented craftsperson well familiar with the materials, the process of lofting does not allow significant opportunities to explore the ornamental or aesthetic potential of the frame itself.

Digital Craft                                                                                                                                  The digital design of the boat ended up being remarkably similar to the process of lofting. Points were used to create cross sections that were altered along the length of the boat. The sections were then connected using a “loft” component in Grasshopper.

The main difference between the traditional method and the digital method lies in the flexibility and analytical potential of the digital method. The designer can easily create multiple hull shapes and evaluate them simultaneously from all directions in the virtual environment. With a little more time, it would be entirely possible to include performance analysis as a part of the script to better understand the functional impact of formal alterations. The design process could even be automated to some degree by designating specific standards as rules in a program such as Galapagos. The most interesting challenge to traditional methods occurs at the level of fabrication. To fabricate the form of the boat at full scale, marine grade plywood can be cut into a number of slotted sections that will interlock with one another, creating a thin yet rigid hull. This has both advantages and disadvantages when compared with the tradition of individually steam bent pieces. Specifically, while the traditionally crafted hull will be somewhat lighter and stronger, the cost, skill and the amount of time required for fabrication will be greatly reduced for the digitally crafted boat. Because plywood is composed of many thin layers of wood with alternating grain directions, the material is equally strong in any direction. This means that the material is not restricted in the direction it can be oriented, opening unique potentials for ornament in the arrangement of the slotted sections.

Assessments and Adaptations                                                                                                       To test this project I developed a ¼ scale model out of 1/16” chipboard that I consider to have been moderately successful in fulfilling the stated goals. First, while the boat scrip I created in grasshopper was mostly successful, I believe that this effort dominated the amount of time spent on the project as a whole and left little time for the direct investigation of the ornamental potential of the structure. The appearance of the final structure was largely determined by the use of a downloaded “waffle” script, that was not exactly correlated to the nature of this type of hollowed out form. Specifically, the waffle script assumed a thick solid three dimensional form that would be sectioned evenly throughout, at fairly large intervals. This resulted in too few sectional pieces that could not intersect with enough frequency to be self-stabilizing. From the perspective of ornamentation, this prevented me from having much control over the patterns created by the intersecting pieces. While they are generally making an interesting design that would be seen through the transparent skin of the boat, a closer look betrays some very ungraceful intersections between the parts. Adapting the waffle script to allow for uneven spacing of the sectional pieces, and to make the intervals smaller would have greatly improved the durability, ease of assembly and appearance of the assembled boat.


Works Cited

Iwamoto, Lisa. Digital Fabrications: Architectural and Material Techniques. New York: Princeton Architectural Press,2009. Print.

Rossel, Greg. The Boatbuilder’s Apprentice. Camden: International Marine, 2007. Print.

p3_Final_Natalie Levinson

Cellular Breakdowns and Warping the Path: A Study in Volumetric Sculpting

Precedent: Vertical Village

Precedent: Richard Serra's walkable sculptures

PROPOSAL:

My original project proposal stemmed from a precedent I had found called Vertical Village – a skyscraper city design generated with Galapagos using a Voronoi algorithm. At first, I wanted to apply the same process to a local site, Wilson Auditorium. However, I soon realized that what attracted me to the design was the sculptural quality of the spaces within, not the endless possibilities or the gradual evolutionary process. Therefore, I moved my investigation to manual manipulation of polygons in Maya, choosing a site adjacent to Wilson on the hillside. The goal of this investigation was to create a walkable landscape that heightened one’s awareness of their relationship with space. The powerful sensation that results from simply tilting walls along a path has been explored by Richard Serra with his walkable metal sculptures. However, his sculptures focus entirely on the path, while Vertical Village focuses primarily on occupiable space. I chose to include both in my project.

PROCESS:

40'x20'x5' polygon box, with 3 divisions in the x & y directions

Polyextrude the back row 10', the middle row 5'

Cut faces tool, using the above menu options to offset pieces. After each cut, use the Fill tool to turn the hollow fragments back into solids.

Use the Separate tool to isolate pieces and delete as desired to form walkable voids

One fragment at a time, select each face and extrude them inward to create a frame on each surface. Without de-selecting, use the Smooth tool to soften the lines. Turn off all on/off options in the right panel to make the changes visible. Keep in mind that the number of divisions in the right panel controls how smooth the outlines appear (1-3 is a safe range). Once satisfied with the result, delete the interior faces.

If desired, extract views for atmospheric renderings.

Once the Maya model is complete, production of the physical model may begin. I chose Pepakura, a free online program that "unfolds" the planes of the Maya solids and makes a printable template.

Import the Maya model into Pepakura. If the planes of the model don't pierce each other, then Pepakura generates a clean, printable template as a jpeg file. For a $30 membership, Pepakura allows you to save your files and convert them to vector files if desired.

RESULTS:

My project was cellular and biomorphic in nature. In retrospect, Pepakura probably wasn’t the best fabrication medium for a large number of tiny, complex units. Cutting, folding, and reassembling proved much more difficult and time-consuming than expected, despite the helpful tabs and numbered edges that the program generated on the template. Also, the limits of an 8.5″x11″ sheet weren’t appropriate for this project. In the future, I would use a more durable material such as chipboard at a larger scale.

Regardless of the challenges that arose in fabrication, the design succeeds in its ability to sculpt occupiable space. It creates tension with its heavy-looking masses hovering above the walking path, and the tilting wall that leans toward the path heightens this effect. The organic hollowing of the units emphasizes the cellular composition of the pieces, and invites viewers to explore these spaces.

I explored a landscape, but cellular breakdowns and volumetric shifting translates easily to any scale, from buildings to product design. Zaha Hadid’s “Space Bar”, shown below, demonstrates volumetric shift at the level of a product. Incorporation of the unfamiliar, such as a series of ellipse-shaped frames, into the everyday, generally orthogonal landscape of a building interior presents a stark contrast, encourages investigation, and tangibly alters human interaction surrounding the unfamiliar conditions in the space.

Zaha Hadid's "Space Bar" demonstrates an unconventional manipulation of space at a more human scale.




p3_final_Andy McCarthy_#001

Practical Application: P3 – Wall Segment

Some comments on my P1 post pointed out that there are very few brick-laying robots available for contemporary architects to use.  Although this is true, my intention for the post was to show how bricks could be lain in the future, and that this wouldn’t necessarily affect construction now.  I was imagining that one day everything would be built with technological precision by robots.  After doing a bit more research into fluid forms made of brick, I came across the Church of Christ the Worker, designed by the Uruguayan architect Eladio Dieste.  He designed a roof for the church with a thin membrane of brick, only one wythe wide.  The double-curvature catenary arch he invented is called a gaussian vault.  The church was designed in 1950 and completed in 1956.  I’m not sure if it took six years to build, but every part of the church was built by hand and onsite using scaffolding that connected taught rope.  Even though a robotic arm can build a complex brick wall, so can the human hand.

Cristo Obrero:

Image courtesy of http://www.urbanhabitatchicago.org/blog/pioneering-engineers/

Image courtesy of http://www.digitalfutures.info/1/sinusoidal-wall-of-eladio-dieste-studies-001%20/

Grasshopper script of Christ the Worker:

Dieste GH 6.ghx

Fabrication technology today makes more precise stencils, dies, and molds than the handiwork of the 1950s.  The CNC machine and powder printing machine can make molds with great specificity for poured concrete modules.  The laser cutter can create amazingly accurate dies, which is what I originally thought I would use to lay out the concrete slabs.  I decided to build a retaining wall/bench for my final project, one without mortar but a highly durable epoxy.  This project was just a demonstration, and since I wouldn’t be gluing each course to the ones below and above it, I decided to plot stencils of the layout on 36″-wide rolls.  The plots had to be exactly to scale, with just enough information per sheet to place the slabs correctly.  A 7′-long, 3′-wide stencil was plotted for each of the six slab courses in this retaining wall segment.  A black outline showed the location for that particular slab, plus a gray outline of the slab that was just lain below it.  This way every slab’s location was demarcated by the location of the slab below it.  Originally I planned to laser cut a length-wise die for the undulating wall, and have those six dies anchored by two dowels, one on each side of the wall segment.  This would have hypothetically worked as well.  At the final critique Ming suggested that several top-to-bottom dies could have also been used to ensure accuracy of the wave surface.  The success of this project is its exploration of constructing a parametric design without using heavy machinery.

I first tried a script by Walter Zesk.  It only allowed one course of bricks to be created, so I changed everything on the script that was for curves into surfaces.  However, what I ended up with was too twisty.

I first tried the script by Walter Zesk. It only allowed one course of bricks to be created, so I changed everything on the script that was for curves into surfaces. However, what I ended up with was too twisty.

A parametric design for a brick structure allows for many changes to the variables and parameters of a project that would be incalculable for a 20th century architect.  This wall segment was built by hand after first using standard-performance computers, affordable and user-friendly software, and the use of complex, although accessible, fabrication technology.  There were many options for each student to choose from in designing their final project.  Some students had higher performing computers and chose to work outside of the lab.  Some people downloaded software that wasn’t available on the Daap computers, specifically Galapagos, which was used in one project.  Most students used Maya or Rhino/Grasshopper.  Most students laser cut or powder printed their projects.  For my project, I found that the software that can modify parameters for the most nuanced result was Grasshopper.  In GH the parameters such as wall height, wall width, module dimensions, the number of courses and the space between them, etc, are connected to number sliders.  The range of variation was set, and I would adjust the parameters with the sliders to find the best outcome.  However, there were a few scripts that were published on the internet, including Ming’s site, that used sliders to modify voxels and how they were stacked.  It took three tries to find the most direct result.

Ultimately, I used Ming Tang's explode script to make the project.

Ultimately, I used Ming Tang's explode script to make the project.

I then sectioned each brick course.

I then sectioned each brick course.

After sectioning the brick layout, I plotted six 3'x7' stencils.

After sectioning the brick layout, I plotted six 3'x7' stencils.

The retaining wall/bench was originally conceived as a seat for about three people.  It was ultimately designed as a wall that had three nooks where people could step into from the sidewalk and send a text message, or wait for a car to pull around.  The wave is like a shelf or high bench at some points, and like a wall with a slight lean backwards at other points.  Because retaining walls must resist the lateral force of the earth they hold back, the orientation of the concrete slabs would be best lain parallel to that force.  However for a seat, the preferred orientation would have the 16″ side perpendicular to the person, not the 8″ side.

Presentation1

First attempt using Walter Zesk’s script (http://www.zesks.com/walter/grasshopper-scripting):

make CA wall along curve 2 wythes

make CA wall along curve 2 wythes, modification

Ming Tang’s explode script (http://www.ming3d.com/DAAP):

explode

I later found a very good script by Ted Ngai (http://www.tedngai.net/experiments/parametric-brick-tiling.html):

brickTiler02

Watch the R-O-B at work in Chinatown:

p3_Kevin Donovan

Presentation PDF

My Grasshopper Defnition

Inspiration.
I began project three with the simple idea of developing a new, dynamic ventilation system. For form, I looked at forms ranging from the natural, such as how the spines of a beaver work, to existing precedents of roof systems like those of world cup stadiums. I took cues from Alienware’s Area 51 Desktop and its active mechanical ventilation and began contemplating how I could improve upon the design in both efficiency and stylistic response.  I eventually recalled an image of a type of steel cladding that consisted of a field of interlocking diamonds, which set the direction for my actual form.

Geometry.
When I initially began building the actual panel that would come to be replicated across my “field,” I did not specifically know which program I would be doing my final version, so to develop exactly wanted it all to look like, I did study iterations of the diamond panel in SketchUp in order to determine the size and proportioning.

I experimented a bit with translating the geometry into Maya, but found it too hard to control from a precision standpoint, so I turned to Grasshopper/Rhino. As my first time working on my own with no real direction in such a fairly unfamiliar program, I began with a simple starting point on the origin (0,0,0). From there I executed a series of movies to build the other points which would create the surfaces. These movements were all controlled in proportion by functions so that regardless of how big the initial length of the panel was, it would maintain its shape and depth. Once I had the points, I created surfaces using the 4-Point Surface command. In order to save myself some time, I only created surfaces for half of the panel and then simply mirrored that half about the YZ axis (I will come back to this soon enough)

The definition for my diamond panel.

The finished diamond panel.

The Grid.
In order to have a surface that could be completely closed off, I had to develop a grid system that allowed my panels to interlock. I started off with a simple surface that I could control the size of, once again, in functionally constrained proportions with incrimentation based off of the panel sizes so that regardless of either the size of the panel or the size of the grid, all would fit and function. To allow the panels to interlock, I culled the number sets coming out of the surface grid and shifted every other row half the width a panel. When my created geometry was applied to the grid, however, I discovered that it would still mirror my panels based on the global ZY axis as opposed to that of each local panel. This was remedied by defining a vertical surface in my panel with already existing points and then using that as the plane of mirror.

The definition for my interlocking grid.

Image Reaction.
The final and possibly most important function of my project is the reaction to “heat,” interpreted in the form of an image file. In order to develop the ventilation of panels, images were imported into the file and inherently overlaid onto whatever the current size of the grid was, with each pixel of the image porting out a value of color value from 0.0 to 1.0. This value was multiplied by a factor of 90 to determine the rotation for each individual panel which grasshopper did a surprisingly great job distributing the values back over the grid. This allowed any panel in a zone with a white, or hot, value to self-adjust as open to ventilate, and vise-versa for any panel sitting on a pixel with a black, or cool, value. The result is a kinetic composition with potential response to a number of conditions such as sun exposure, programmatic light issues, and ventilation necessity.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFN5i8TJCZE

Finished definition.

My fabricated version.

Protected: p3_George Faber_final presentation

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


p_3 Molly Wimmel

The objective of my project was to explore the relationship between curved and angular spaces, especially the transition between the two. At first I thought I would achieve this by creating a surface pattern and altering this as I moved across the surface, but I decided my idea would be more effective if I incorporated it into the actual shape of the object, as opposed to just using it as a 2D detail.

I also wanted to incorporate fashion design into my final, so I chose to make a dress. I created four curved and angular shapes in Maya, then lofted between them. From there, I was able to experiment with a lot of shapes based on those four original curves. I then imported my geometry into Rhino, exploded the shape, and used the smash command to flatten all my pieces so that they could be laser cut out of leather.

My final in Maya, before exporting to Rhino.

This project was related with performance based design because I was able to explore a number of shape possibilities. I plan on fabricating this full size and in that case, I would use my original curves as the constants for bust, waist, and hip measurements. These general measurements would control what the general outline of the figure would be, but I would still have some control over what the final outcome was by twisting and rotating the curves.

The major issue I ran into with regard to fabrication was that the leather I used was relatively thin (I had originally chosen it because I needed something thin enough to hand stitch through but that was heavy enough to hold its shape once sewn). Because the leather was thin, it stretched and bubbled significantly as I sewed it. If I was going to manufacture this full scale, I would want to explore other fabrications, as well as ways of using boning or wire as support underneath the exterior shell. If bubbling was unavoidable, I’d want to work more with it to make the bubbling look more purposeful/like an intentional design element.

In conclusion, I think this was a very successful first run at this project. There are definitely still a lot of issues I’d want to work out before making a final, but at this point I think I could adjust the pattern to fit a model and then enlarge it to produce a first muslin. I would also want to make a few other small scale models to experiment with other fabrics and seaming techniques.

It was nice to find a connection between fashion and parametric design. Going into my pre-junior year, I hadn’t been able to use digital pattern making software until this class. Using parametric modeling programs to develop a pattern opens up significant possibilities with respect to silhouette and design. Patterning a garment such as this without digital help would take a lot of unnecessary work and multiple samples. Using parametric design cut out a lot of this and allowed me to focus more on the original silhouette and less on how I was going to go about making a pattern for the garment.

P3_Final_Sarah Mapel_001

Project 2

Utilizing Maya and its various capabilities, Project 2 was a visualization of squaring a number and the complexity that results from this process. Starting with the number two, I bisected a square into two parts in both directions, and then divided the square with two diagonals. I then proceeded to apply various affects to this base layer. These affects I carried through consistently with the other two layers, which were studies of divisions into four parts with four diagonals, and sixteen parts with sixteen diagonals.

The overall final form of the screen design was inspired by various organic shapes that transform themselves to be useful, yet appealing means of cladding a building, providing shading, or acting as an interactive art exhibit. The diminishing voids from layer to layer on the final screen work especially well for creating limited lines of sight with a consideration for temperature control combined with the benefits of day lighting.

Project 3

The Lily is the result of parametric and non-linear thinking and design applied to an initial goal. This objective began with the hopes of creating modular pieces that would fit together without any extraneous connections while operating in such a way that the individual pieces would create many different shapes when combined together, depending on the orientation and the number used. This thought was initially inspired by the VLightDeco IQ Puzzle Pendant Jigsaw Lamp (seen below).

Throughout the design process, my parameters became more defined and specific, resulting in a slightly different final product than what I had initially intended. These included tessellation qualities, in order to conserve materials, flat-pack capability, so that the unassembled product could be shipped conservatively and cheaply, and finally, I wanted each individual piece to have a built-in means of connecting to the other pieces so that no glue, tape or other adhesive was necessary. Thus, the only component that would be shipped would be the pieces ready to be assembled, further enhancing the flat-pack capability.

These parameters were directly linked to the final component operating as a performance-based design. Not only did it satisfy all the rules laid down, but it also had an appealing aesthetic quality that could be used by a wide variety of audience members. Furthermore, it is flexible, can take on a varied number of shapes, and can be coordinated so that the user can interchange components depending on the color of the surrounding environment.

Created entirely via sketching and numerous experimentations with scissors and paper, the parametric design process was not carried out in the way many may imagine, but was conducted without computer aided design programs such as Autodesk Maya or Grasshopper for Rhino. Despite the fact that I did not employ technology as we know it, I shared many similarities with those who do utilize computer programs to aid in parametric thinking. Like them, I did not have a clear image of what I wanted my final product to look like – I merely had a set of rules that I was determined to follow. However, rather than tracing my thought process through a Grasshopper script or similar means, the results of my design development where visible in the discarded physical paper models.

Although I was very pleased with the finished result, the means to that end did provide some problems along the way – foremost of which revolved around the constraints of fabrication. Experimenting with paper and scissors was all well and good for the “rough drafts,” as I like to call them, but the transition to a more resilient, long-lasting material proved difficult. The first attempt at this involved laser cutting a thin acrylic in the hopes that it would be strong enough not to wrinkle (as the paper had), but flexible enough that the bends in the material would not cause it to snap. However, after a few attempts at laser cutting, the acrylic proved to be a failure. It did not score without breaking, and attempting to bend the material freehand typically resulted in it snapping and becoming unusable. I also envisioned a final product with multiple color options, rather than the milky white and clear that the acrylic embodied, so I went in search of another solution. I finally landed upon a thick, strong construction paper that came in a variety of colors and would score without breaking. Although this material worked fine for the final product for the time being, if this design were to be mass produced, a much more resilient material would have to be found. The construction paper was great as long as one were careful with it, but overtime, wear and tear would ultimately show.

In the future, I hope not only to improve upon the materiality of the design, but hope to take this idea further to try to come up with variations on volume, shape, and color. To do this, I may have to tweak the parameters to potentially invent an entirely new form, but it would also be interesting to see if I could keep the parameters the same, but come up with an entirely new form that still satisfied all the requirements, reflecting the notion that the Grasshopper plug-in, Galapagos, employs: there are many solutions for the same problem, but not all of them may be the best one. I believe that the Lily is definitely one of these solutions, but I also believe that there are many more, and the best one is still waiting to be found.

The link to the powerpoint presentation about the Lily is listed below.

Presentation

Credits:

http://vlightdeco.blogspot.com/p/conventional-version.html

p3_final_Jessica Helmer_#001

Beginnings: P2 – Fractal Screen

At the beginning of the quarter I was interested in using parametric programs to design architecture with fractal properties. Choosing where and when to repeat the fractal pattern, I could create areas of greater or less density to control light, visual access or even express load transfers in a structure. For our first project, a three-layer screen, I chose to go with a simple branching pattern using the “interactive split” and “triangulate” tools in Maya.

P3 – Light Column

Even though I deviated from the fractal patterns for the final project, I still wanted to continue to work with the idea of a pattern with various levels of density and transparency in order to control light. I came across three precedents that would help me in my design.

The first precedent comes from designer Pierre Poussin and his Mitosis Courtyard in downtown Toronto. The courtyard included light columns, made up of a laser cut steel shell wrapped around a frosted polycarbonate cylinder which housed programmable LED’s.

Image courtesy of http://www.pierrepoussin.com/

Pierre’s pattern varied little in scale, however, and I imagined my light column to be more opaque where it met the floor, and more transparent as it met the ceiling. I imagined a density gradient similar one that I found on the website of SOM employee, John Locke.

Image courtesy of http://gracefulspoon.com/blog/2009/03/04/summer-studio/

I also imagined that the column could meet the floor and ceiling in a gradual, sweeping motion. The pattern on the column could then continue onto the ceiling, much like the bamboo cladded restaurant found at the Tang Palace in Hangzhou, China.

Image courtesy of http://www.fcjz.com/

Combining all of these principles I set out to create my light column. I chose to work almost exclusively in Maya and probably took the “long way” around many steps. Because of this, however, I was exposed to a wider range of tools and operations within the program and now feel very comfortable using Maya to design future projects. There were, of course, many iterations that were abandoned and much trial-and-error involved. In the end, I chose to make a column where the apertures 1) increased in diameter and 2) increased in the number of sides as you moved up the column.

The Steps:

My first steps were much like Ming’s “Wood Mirror” tutorial series on www.ming3d.com. I also created a video tutorial series for the column design. Links to my videos can be found in the references section at the end of this blog.

1) I started with a NURBS surface which I bent using the sculpt geometry tool and a simple gradient image. I used soft select and scale tools to alter the grid to my liking.

2) I then created a separate polygon cone with a subdivision axis of 3. I set a driver/driven key on this shape so that it would increase in diameter and in the number of subdivision axes as you moved in the Z direction (long axis of the NURBS plane).

3) I then used Ming’sduplicate with input node script to populate the NURBS surface with the polygon cone. Since the cone had a driver/driven key set, the shapes changed in diameter and subdivision axes as they populated the NURBS plane. They also follow the bend of the NURBS plane that I had set through the sculpt geometry tool.

4) Exporting the shapes (and not the NURBS plane) into Rhino, I used the section tool to cut a straight section through the bottom of the large hexagonal cones and through the tops of the triangle cones.

5) Importing these curves back into Maya, I projected them onto a new NURBS surface and used the trim tool to cut out apertures from those projected shapes.

6) Using the non-linear bend tool I wrapped the NURBS plane into a column (I merged the edges of the seam together in step 8 after I converted the NURB to a polygon). I also used the non-linear twist tool to add further interest to the shape.

7) I applied the lattice deformation tool to create the funnels on either end of the column. This simulated how the column met the ceiling and floor.

8 ) To give the column some thickness for renderings or powder printing, I first converted the NURB into a polygon, merged the edges of the seam together, and extruded. For structural rigidity, I made my powder printed model relatively thick. For my renderings, I extruded less.

9) To create the ceiling effect seen in the final rendering, I used the stitch vertices tool as well as the soft select tool to scale and rotate the pattern.

Final Thoughts

I imagined that this would be a cladding, laser cut from steel and wrapped around a polycarbonate light insert, as in Pierre Poussin’s mitosis column. However, as pointed out in the review, it can certainly be structural just like Frank Lloyd Wright’s mushroom columns in the Johnson Wax building or like Nervi Giatti’s Wool Mill. The pattern and thickness of the ceiling pattern can easily be altered to better reflect structural loading and one could cast it out of concrete or steel.

The rendered scene as a whole reminded me of an ocean theme. The columns themselves are reminiscent of certain coral and the ceiling pattern gives the effect of rippling water. I imagined that lighting effects could enhance this feel. Overhead LED lighting that change in intensity and color, combined with the shadows of the ceiling pattern, could create some very cool “underwater“ effects on the floor.

I’ve found that rendering certain lighting effects in Maya is much harder than I thought. I’m interested in furthering my knowledge in this area so I can create a comprehensive scene that properly reflects what I imagined it to be.

Appendix

The following links are swf flash movie tutorials for the column:

Click here to view the original power point presentation

P03 Final_Nicholas Schoeppner_001

For the sun shade project, I wanted to achieve an interesting composition for any building to utilize using the three layers required for the project. I researched a few shading techniques on other building and discovered that the shading created with the use of thin, intricate shapes with more void than solid were the most intriguing patterns. So, in my project, I tried to incorporate this with inspiration from a bee’s nest being deformed by a heavy weight being placed on it.

Using Autodesk Maya, I was able to imagine what that “beehive” would look like after deformation. I used the soft select tool on selected vertices and manipulated them in areas where shape changes would take place. I key framed my first stage and last stage of transformation then created an animation snapshot to get multiple middle pieces. I then chose the most appropriate section and extruded all three with Ming Tang’s super extrude script. After digital design was completed, I tried to send it to the RPC for fabrication with a laser cutting but my voids were too large which meant the laser would cut through areas I did not want it to. In order to fix this I had to mess with the file in Rhino and manipulate the shapes to be the proper distance apart.

Project 2 required us to develop an object that is parametrically controlled so I chose to deal with structural elements and how we can manipulate them to fit any building shape. In order to start with this concept, I decided to use a building currently under construction that had a unique shape and unique structural challenge. The Santiago Calatrava designed Transportation Hub at the World Trade Center seemed to be the correct precedent for exploration. Calatrava used Autodesk Maya for his final design which does not bode well to parametrically controlling the shape, spacing and height of the structural columns so I decided to write a Grasshopper script that achieved the same basic form, but also allowed for changes to be easily made.

Image: http://0.tqn.com/d/architecture/1/0/e/h/transportationhubNY_exterior_0374hi20res.jpg

In order to achieve this, I first began with a range of points in a linear direction. The number of points controlled the number of columns I would eventually have. I then needed to create a parabolic curve that also translated in the z direction for the height, not just the x and y direction. For this I plugged a function into my range with {sin(x/y)*z} as the equation, allowing me to adjust a slider which controlled the height, frequency and the open angle. Using two of these sine curves with the same points, I connected them with a line, thus creating the skeleton for the columns. To model the columns, I created two distinct shapes along the points of both curves and connected them with a loft using each line as an axis for every column. In order to create the top pieces (the shading element for the interior of the building), I simply rotated the columns I created along the top sine curve and used a non-uniform scale to control the different cross section and length of these members. To make the Calatrava inspired building a three dimensional reality, I mirrored my previous geometries which allowed the entire building to be manipulated parametrically with just a few sliders. At the end of my script are areas dedicated to rendering an animation* and flattening the pieces for laser cutting, so they can be ignored if neither are needed for other future designs with this script.

The shape I created was just an exploration on using Grasshopper and no other modeling program to create an architectural structure. This script can be easily manipulated to place columns along a linear grid or with random points in space.  All that has to be done is replace the sine function with the shape of preference for the designer and the columns should be just as easy to manipulate.

To view my video, follow this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IG2eZ1UuMq8

For fabricating this project, I wanted the physical model to be able to rotate just like the digital model was able to do. I designed the laser cut pieces to have holes in the ends of the acrylic pieces so they could connect with a dowel or bolt, allowing them to rotate freely depending on the shading required.  My model is nine inches long in the center column which creates a problem when using dowels as the pivoting element since the reality is that dowels just let the top pieces rotate down due to gravitational loads. The way to combat this is to use something with threads such as a screw or bolt, which will create grooves in the acrylic and prevent the pieces from moving down unintentionally. I also only built half of the model and mirrored it so the cutting cost and fabrication time would be less.

Both projects have been useful for my education and can be utilized for an actual design project later on in my career. The sun shade can be used in virtually every project and can be an intriguing way to deal with shading without using shades or louvers to thwart the intensity of the sun at midday.  Not only will the grasshopper script be useful for other structures in the future, but the fact that I now have the knowledge of how to use Grasshopper is a very valuable tool for my future designs. I am very thankful to Ming for teaching this class because I know Grasshopper will be a tool I can utilize for many years to come and I enjoyed every minute of it.

*Render script from Giulio Piacentino on his website: http://www.giuliopiacentino.com/

Presentation powerpoint:Final Presentation

Grasshopper Script: Calatrava Shape